The working A prototype: use its controls to test the build question.
Design how use, corrections and outcomes improve a product over time.
RN conceived the question, structured the evidence boundaries, designed the experience, implemented the prototype and documented its limits.
This independent prototype demonstrates an approach; it is not a deployed client system, professional advice or proof of real-world outcomes.
Work through the controls with a situation of your own rather than the sample values. The tool responds to what you put in, so the useful output comes from real input, and everything is processed in your browser as you go. Any sample content you find already loaded is there to show the shape of a filled-in state, and you can clear it and start again at any point.
The build overview sets out the question, the purpose, the role and the evidence status in one place, and the public record behind it states what changed, what another person can reuse and what supports the system. If you want to judge how far this build should be trusted, the record is the page to read, not this one.
BUILD 007-A
Feedback Loop Product Architecture
Map what the product can hear, who may act, and what must happen before feedback becomes a validated and communicated improvement.
Local workspace: do not enter personal, identifying, or confidential feedback. Nothing is sent or stored; export is your action.
02 / DEFINE WHAT IT CAN HEAR
Feedback event schema
Use
What people do—not who they are.
Outcome
What changed after use.
Correction
A way to contest or repair an output.
Unmet need
A job the current product still cannot serve.
Human control architecture
GOVERNED LOOP
Event coverage: 4/4 · Build 001 human-control inheritance: 16/16 · Strong
Priorities
All tested architecture gates are present. Validate the real operating process before relying on it.
Improvement backlog rules
- Urgent corrections enter human triage before ordinary product requests.
- No signal becomes a change without a named owner, evidence standard, and decision record.
- Changes require a validation rule and rollback/escalation path proportionate to consequence.
- Feedback collection is minimized to the stated purpose and retention rule.
- People affected by a material behavior change are notified through the defined communication rule.
Boundary: this is an inspectable architecture heuristic. It does not prove that feedback is representative, that a change caused an outcome, or that the product is safe, compliant, desirable, or ready to deploy.