Skip to main content

Research atlas · 01 October 2026 · pre-fieldwork

THE RAW SYSTEM

Dutch Design Week as a critical lens for opening up the technical and human construction of RN’s 100 Builds.

Independent editorial research. Not produced by, partnered with, endorsed by or affiliated with Dutch Design Week or Dutch Design Foundation. “Dutch Design Week,” “DDW” and “R.A.W.” are referenced descriptively.

OFFICIAL FACT

DDW26: 17–25 October, Eindhoven

The 26th edition uses R.A.W.—Rebel Authentic Worth to foreground the unpolished, investigative and experimental. DDW describes design as questioning, experimenting and revealing alternatives—not only presenting outcomes.

Official theme statement · 23 July 2026 · Official press page

OFFICIAL PROGRAMME ARCHITECTURE

The programme is a matrix, not a single aesthetic

Five missions

Digital Future · Equal Society · Health & Wellbeing · Living Environment · Thriving Planet

Five perspectives

Independent & Critical · Product & Craft · Service & Innovative · Signature & Collectible · Speculative & Social

Nine areas

Canal · Center · Hallenweg · Other · Sectie-C · Station · Strijp-S · Strijp T+R · West

Formats

Exhibitions · seminars · workshops · networking · talks, debates and presentations

Scale

2,500+ designers · about 100 locations · 350,000 visitors stated by DDW

The live programme is dynamic. This atlas records its architecture and priority nodes; it does not claim a frozen item-by-item export of every listing. Browse the official 2026 programme.

SOURCED INTERPRETATION

R.A.W. is a method, not a distressed texture.

For The 100, “raw” should mean that the decisions remain inspectable: versions, prompts, architecture, failed attempts, tradeoffs, human overrides, test evidence and unresolved questions. Artificial tape, torn-paper effects or fluorescent color alone would imitate an appearance while hiding the process DDW is asking viewers to examine.

DESIGN + AI PRIORITY MAP

The conference’s useful friction with the AI expo

01

5th Design & AI Symposium

20 October · TU/e, TU Delft and University of Twente researchers take stock of what AI has gained and cost design after years of hype.

02

Slow & Small AI

A counter-model to scale-at-all-costs: small, situated systems; slower communication; doubt and reflection.

03

CODE 2026: Terms of Intimacy

Seven works turn biometric consent, AI companionship, moderation, hidden ML labour and refusal into bodily experiences.

04

transparent.citizen

Mees Boeijen makes AI surveillance reciprocal: the watched designer and observing visitor become part of the experiment.

BEACONS + MATERIAL FRONTIER

Emma van der Leest and Anab Jain

DDW’s 2026 Beacons establish two complementary modes: Van der Leest makes living systems, material research and scaling tangible through biodesign; Jain and Superflux make possible futures experiential so present choices can be debated. The official highlights widen that field through 3D-printed architecture, recycled and insect-derived materials, energy visualisation and collective-action design.

Official Beacons announcement · 1 September 2026 · Official highlights · 29 September 2026

HISTORICAL LINEAGES · INTERPRETIVE, NOT DDW CLAIMS

What “Dutch design” can legitimately teach the system

De Stijl

Reduction, modular relations and asymmetric balance—not a license to paste red/yellow/blue rectangles onto everything.

Dutch modernist graphics

Grid discipline, direct type, public-information clarity and serial systems.

Critical and speculative design

Objects and scenarios as arguments: make consequences tangible enough to debate.

Droog and conceptual product design

Ordinary materials, wit and conceptual economy; the idea remains visible in the object.

Eindhoven’s industrial ecosystem

Making, testing and restarting; Philips/TU/e/Design Academy/Strijp as a working ecology rather than décor.

Contemporary social and biodesign

Design as collaboration with communities, institutions, organisms and material systems—not surface styling.

Boundary: these are broad historical reference lines selected for RN’s project, not a claim that DDW26 endorses one canonical “Dutch style.” The contemporary programme is deliberately plural and international.

PROPOSED RN ADAPTATION

A technical exhibition catalogue a twelve-year-old can rebuild.

System skeleton

A persistent technical grid: build number, version, input, transformation, output, test, failure, status.

Evidence as image

Use real screens, code, source fragments, model traces, test outputs and documented iterations—never generic AI icons.

Productive interruption

Allow one element per slide to break the grid when it marks uncertainty, conflict, failure or a human decision.

Materials, not filters

RN’s photographs, scans, tickets, field notes, workshop surfaces and conference observations supply texture.

Radical instruction

Every step names the exact tool, action, input, output, branch, failure state and verification. No “connect the API.”

Exhibition label

End with readable sources, rights, limits, live URL, repository, build status and explicit non-affiliation.

THE 100 · CONTENT BLUEPRINT

Four acts, sixteen modules

  1. Provocation
  2. Situation and user
  3. Design position
  4. Capability contract
  5. Inputs and prerequisites
  6. User journey
  7. Architecture
  8. Data flow and state
  9. AI versus deterministic logic
  10. Exact workflow and branches
  11. Safeguards and permissions
  12. Actual interface
  13. Build chronology and failures
  14. Evaluation and remaining uncertainty
  15. Replication sheet
  16. Design reflection + exhibition label

Instruction rule: every step must identify the tool, exact action, required input, resulting output, possible failure, recovery route and test proving completion.

FIELD CAPTURE PROTOCOL

What RN should collect in Eindhoven

CaptureMinimum evidence
ProcessPrototype versions, discarded pieces, taped annotations, jigs, molds, test coupons, error states.
DecisionAsk: What did you refuse? What failed? What changed after a user touched it?
SystemInputs, transformations, outputs, dependencies, human interventions, energy/material/data costs.
ConsequenceWho gains agency? Who performs hidden labour? What can a person contest, delete or refuse?
MaterialFront, back, joins, fasteners, wear, residue, scale reference and surrounding context.
AttributionMaker, project, venue, date, permission/press-kit status and exact source URL before reuse.

RIGHTS + IDENTITY BOUNDARY

Conference-informed, never conference-branded

  • Do not use the DDW logo, wordmark, event lock-up, official identity files or a confusingly similar series mark without written permission.
  • Do not describe RN, The 100 or its publication as an official partner, participant, production or endorsed project.
  • Press-page availability is not a blanket licence. Preserve the named creator/photographer credit and verify permitted editorial reuse for each downloaded asset.
  • Use RN’s own field photography and documentation by default; record permission when a work, person or installation is the subject.
  • Reference programme titles and theme terms only to report, critique and contextualise the visit, with source links and dates.
  • Keep an explicit independent-editorial disclaimer on every Netherlands-series landing surface.

This is a conservative production boundary, not legal advice. Confirm ambiguous asset uses with DDW press. Official press, brand-assets and image-library gateway.

DECISION

What to build next

  1. Freeze mass Canva import; retain the 700 certified slides as content inventory.
  2. Reconstruct three technically different builds from repositories, deployments and commit histories.
  3. Design one complete pilot in this “raw system / radical instruction” language.
  4. Create two materially different alternatives for the same build, not palette swaps.
  5. Test cold-reader comprehension, replication accuracy, mobile legibility and unmistakable non-affiliation.
  6. Use RN’s October field material to revise the chosen system before scaling across all 100.

SOURCES + COVERAGE

Primary-source register

Open gaps as of 1 October 2026: the live programme may still change; field observations do not yet exist; official 2026 brand-asset files and their embedded licence terms were not reproduced here; venue-level wayfinding, motion behavior and printed identity require direct observation; creator-specific photo permissions must be cleared asset by asset. Those gaps are labeled rather than converted into assumptions.