Skip to main content
← BUILD 004PROGRAM ARCHIVE
DURABLE BUILD ARCHIVE / CERTIFIED PUBLIC

BUILD 004
Manual Intelligence Engine

A research system should expose collection, provenance, source/claim separation, verification state, contradiction, uncertainty, and synthesis rules before any automation is allowed to hide them.

QUESTIONWhat has to be true before research deserves automation?
CERTIFIED PUBLIC BUILD ARCHIVE

The complete structured public archive is certified for this build.

DURABLE-RECORD RULE

This page exists so the durable record does not depend on conversation history. Research, decisions, generated artifacts, audits, limitations, media metadata, plans and canonical source paths are retained here as part of the build itself. A listed repository path proves that an implementation record was retained; it does not independently support a real-world factual claim.

SOURCE-LINK AVAILABILITY

7 of 7 listed retained paths have a public reader link on this archive page. Unlinked paths remain named for traceability but are not represented as publicly inspectable evidence.

01 / RESEARCH + EVIDENCE

What informed the build

Manual Intelligence Engine Method v1data/build-004-engine-v1.json

Governed source schema, claim schema, verification contract, evidence-boundary invariants, and limitations.

Provenance upgrade

Issuer/author, publication/version, source date, checked/retrieval date, and relevant section/page were made explicit rather than buried in notes.

Technological-ceiling survey

Automatic retrieval, model synthesis/extraction, vector retrieval, truth scoring, and agentic research were considered and rejected for this cycle because they would automate the method before making it inspectable.

02 / CREATED

What exists because we built it

004-A Manual Intelligence Engine

Collection protocol → source register → claim verification queue → evidence-bounded intelligence brief.

Local JSON research-record export

Preserves the working state without requiring an external service.

03 / ARCHITECTURE + DECISIONS

Why it works this way

Verified requires a verification note

A claim cannot enter verified findings merely because a reviewer clicked a status.

Clearing the note demotes the claim

The system enforces its evidence boundary rather than relying on memory.

Contradiction/uncertainty remain visible

The brief is status-derived; unresolved states cannot be flattened into findings.

04 / AUDIT + RELEASE

How the work was checked

05 / PLANS + OPEN THREADS

What this build intentionally leaves forward

Automation comes later

004 creates the inspectable manual method that future retrieval/synthesis/agentic systems may inherit once their behavior can be governed.

06 / MEDIA

Take the social artifact with you

B-LINKEDIN / CANONICAL FILM

720×900 · 4:5 MP4 · 24 fps · silent-first

CURRENT VERIFIED MEDIA / 30-second film · 331.8 KB

FINAL PROPOSITION / AUTOMATE THE METHOD ONLY AFTER YOU CAN SEE THE METHOD.

SHA-256 6524e75c433aa6d091e2b9f7883df335e9eace3b40e22bbea26fad0d3a22cf96Reproducible from data/linkedin-film-specs-v1.json with scripts/render-linkedin-films.py. The website—not a chat attachment—is the canonical media source.
07 / CANONICAL SOURCE INVENTORY

The repository files that preserve the implementation record

apps/web/app/100-builds/004/a/ManualIntelligenceEngine.tsxapps/web/app/100-builds/004/b/IntelligenceChainStory.tsxdata/build-004-engine-v1.jsondata/build-004-acceptance-v1.jsondata/build-004-artifacts-v1.jsondata/build-004-privacy-support-v1.jsondata/build-004-freshness-performance-v1.jsondocs/builds/004-release-record.mddocs/builds/004-linkedin-production.mdtests/build004.spec.tstests/build004-story.spec.tstests/build004-routing.spec.ts

These paths preserve the implementation record. Only items with an explicit public reader link are publicly inspectable here. A file path, working interface or internal engine is not independent support for a real-world claim; synthetic propositions and design reasoning remain labeled within the retained record.